In manhood.

Women's March: A Man's Role


A year ago today I stood on the Whitehouse lawn in Washington D.C., surrounded by pink hats and the hundreds of thousands of women there to take a political stand. Out of everything in our 4 day school-sponsored trip to D.C., that moment was the pinnacle for me. A government teacher surrounded by true democracy. Not the textbook version: the buildings, the transfer of power, the ceremony, etc. This was real democracy. A nation not afraid to let our voices be heard. The rallying cry 'This is what Democracy looks like' had never been more true. As I stood on the lawn between the seat of power for our nation and the Washington monument I couldn't help but feel something that I hadn't felt throughout much of 2016… Hope.

Even amidst the political climate, 2017 was quite possibly the single most empowering year for women in world history. This has been so exciting for me to watch - to imagine a world where a future daughter can live equally to any man, a world where my wife is rightfully assumed to be a doctor for once when people see her in scrubs, a world where women don’t have to disproportionately live in fear of violence. But outside of my 2-3 hours spent at the March last year, I've often struggled with what my role is in this, or even if I should have a role. It makes sense to me that what might be best would be for me to step back and allow women to have this moment, that creating space for others might be my best move. But I can't help but think that men have a critical role to play in this movement as well.

In reflecting on this over the past year, I argue that we as men do have a role to play, and it's a lot simpler than you might think.

My role as a man - our role as men - is about redefining what we've been told that it is to be a man. For too long we've defined masculinity in terms of power. But in reality masculinity has nothing to do with power. True masculinity is about empowerment.

Instead of defining our success as a man by our own victories -  by power, strength, and respect - let's look at the strongest man as he who creates space for others to thrive. A man who adds value to others - who empowers others, rather than taking power himself.

It is undoubtable that some will argue that asking men to go against their nature is destructive to himself and others. But I'm not arguing to remove what have historically been male societal functions. I'd even say that we can redefine manhood within the historical constructs of manliness. I'm simply suggesting that we challenge what true meaning of the two historic components of manhood: 1.) to protect and 2.) to provide.

To Protect

If we are meant to protect those we love - the women, children, and even other men in our lives, then let's really take a deep dive into how we can do that. Physically protecting those around us is one thing.  Valuing the ability to physically protect those you love is not to be looked down upon. But it's shortsighted. It's placing a band-aid on a cracking dam, treating the symptoms instead of the disease. The largest impact we can make as men is working to create a culture that is safer for all people. That starts with how we teach our young men to view strength.

Strength is a core component of masculinity - Physical strength, Emotional strength. The ability to weather physical or emotional blows without showing signs of weakness. Rigidity is the gold standard for men. We're inundated by it every day - by the advertising industry, by our peers, by older generations. And this isn't just misleading… it's emotionally harmful. This becomes abundantly clear in one statistic: 90% of homicides are committed by males… I'll say that again - 90% of all homicides in America are committed by men… In America's gun culture women have just as much access to fire arms and weaponry as we do. So why do they resort so rarely to violence?... Because that's not the cultural norm…

Fathers and Mothers don't teach their little girls that it's not ok to cry, that they have to stand up for themselves, that they have to fight back. They teach them to talk to someone, a teacher, or an adult, and in times of conflict girls are met with a soothing touch and comfort. On the flipside, Boys are taught to emotionally harden, to handle the issue ourselves, typically by standing up for ourselves and fighting back if necessary.

By associating an emotional void with masculinity while dissociating feeling, we've created an entire culture of men terrified to turn to others when they hurt, men and boys who simply don’t know how to properly handle conflict and trauma without resorting to frustration, anger, and often violence - men who think only physically and never emotionally. This isn't biology - it's society.

This lifelong practice of physical expression but never emotional expression is at the very core of our current rape culture. Men don’t understand consent and sexual harassment because from age 4 the only way to express their desires is physically. If we want to be an ally in the #metoo movement, we'll do a lot more long term good by raising sons who can express themselves emotionally than we will by telling daughters not to walk home alone.

My task in the classroom over the last year has been to be a model of this for my young men. When something makes me emotional - I lean into it. I talk about it. I allow myself to cry in front of my classes, I ask hard questions about the role of human emotion in history. We spend more time trying to understand perspective than we do events. It's a small thing, but I'm doing what I can to be a part of a better tomorrow.

So yes. We are men. We are still protectors. But we do not have to be steel to protect those we love. Water, in all of its fluidity and adaptability, has throughout most of human history made for the strongest defense. We as men do more for those we love by modeling emotional vulnerability than we can possibly do by making ourselves emotionally rigid.

To Provide:

If protection of the ones we love has historically been our primary purpose as men, then a small step below that exists the need to provide. To create a life of joy and ease for those that we love. But to provide is a wide and malleable concept that we've misguidedly pigeonholed into one meaning: financial support.

Each year while teaching I try to spend at least one week talking about long term goals, life-skills, and leadership development. In goal setting there was a line I heard more often than I would've liked to from young men: I want to work hard enough that the rest of my family won't have to.

I couldn't help but internally cringe every time I heard that line for two reasons. Because that narrow definition of being a provider is 1.) the root of so much of my own cognitive dissonance, and 2.) in my opinion the root of our current pay imbalance in the workplace.

I am a male high school teacher who does not coach. I spend my life constantly fighting the internal fears that other men will look down on that. My wife is a medical doctor, currently a resident, who will one day be our family's key financial provider. I've never been able to really shake the feeling that in some way this makes me less of a man. But in truth, what do our loved ones and family really want us to provide?

My own father was, yes, the primary financial provider for the family, but I don’t think back on my childhood with grateful memories for the house we lived in or the Christmas presents we received, or even the private schools we were sent to. I look back and am truly most appreciative for the time he provided our family, and the space he gave each of us to find ourselves. It was coaching my youth baseball teams, yet telling me it's O.K. to quit if it was something that was causing me so much frustration. It was the example Dad provided in coming home from work and cooking for us multiple days of the week. It was the weeknights he spent with my sister and me while my mom took graduate-level classes. Those are the greatest things he really provided for us.

As men, we get so caught up in providing for the financial needs of our families, we miss out on the chances to provide something far greater - permission and acceptance. My role as provider for my wife has, in a small way, meant finances over the past few years. But more importantly it's meant radical permission. I provided Annie my blessing to aggressively pursue her career, even if that means moving 10 hours from home. I provide Annie support when she comes home from a 28 hour shift and just wants to eat and go to bed. And I provide the freedom to have children at our own pace with the knowledge that I will be doing my fair and equal part in the process.

The gender wage gap can be re-defined, misconstrued, and interpreted in umpteen different ways. But the way I see it is simple. If we as men want to be allies in this shift it doesn't start by holding signs or even taking cuts in our own salaries. It starts with providing an equal share of the work in raising children. Providing the permission to other men to take as much time as they need in raising their child instead of shaming them for taking paternity leave. Doing so ultimately provides women the freedom to, if they choose, take less time off from work, doing away with what I'd argue is the single largest driver of the wage gap.

So yes, we are men. We are providers. But are we really providing what those we care about truly need? Provide by being an ally. Empower the women in your life by providing the necessary assistance in their journey to success and fulfillment.

   

So let's start this conversation - let's be allies in this movement by focusing inward. Let's change the narrative around what it means to be a man - to protect and provide. By talking about emotional and physical masculinity with boys and young men we can create a healthier world for men and combat the roots of rape culture. By changing how we look at providing, we make space for the women in our lives to succeed, we enrich our relationships, and provide for the true needs of our loved ones.

So here's to getting out there and doing our part. So that years from now the Women's March won't be necessary as a protest, but will exist only as a celebration of equality.

Links to further reading/viewing on this topic:

disclaimer: all photos taken by me, if for any reason individuals would like their photo taken down, please contact me and I will gladly do so.

Read More

Share Tweet Pin It +1

0 Comments

In life.

Literature Reflection 2017: A look back at the books I read in 2017



At the start of every year I set reading goals. For 2017 My goals were this: 6 works of fiction, 1 historical biography, and 1 other non-fiction.  8 total books. It was my assumption that in a year of celebrating the end of Annie's time in medical school, a summer of moving, and finding a new teaching job, I wouldn't have as much time to read as I might like… So I settled on 8.

1 year later and my number ended up a bit higher… Counting audio books ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ my total this year was 20. 11 works of fiction (one a re-read), 6 works of non-fiction (including 2 biographies), and 3 audio books (great for driving back and forth to North Carolina.)

In the interest of sharing this year's crop of winners, I put together a quick blurb about each one of them, including a quick gut-feeling rating system between 1-10.

As I went back and looked at my notes I remembered some of these very fondly, and others I recall the waste of time that they were. But books, like life, aren't always what you want them to be - that's part of the joy. They can surprise you or disappoint you, inspire you or leave you in the dumps. But just like life, you know in the end you'll always end up coming back for more.

So here's to a great year of reading, and hopefully an even better one in 2018.

FICTION
Blake Crouch - Dark matter - 9.5/10
  • My favorite of the summer. Nothing flashy about it, this was just a brilliant concept done with impressive storytelling prowess. You will finish this book in 1-2 days. It is that good. You will not be able to put it down. Superposition and Infinite realities make this science fiction work one that I couldn't stop thinking about. Hell I'm still thinking about it.

Donna Tartt - The Goldfinch - 9/10
  • Clocking in at 784 pages, this one took me a while to get through, but I promise you it was worth it. Just going back to read a few of my favorite excerpts from the book had me a bit misty eyed remembering how beautifully Tartt wields the English Language. At times unnecessarily lengthy, she makes it completely worth it with the occasional line that completely takes your breath away, like this one that still occasionally stops me in my tracks. 
  • "And just as music is the space between notes, just as the stars are beautiful because of the space between them, just as the sun strikes raindrops at a certain angle and throws a prism of color across the sky - so the space where I exist, and I want to keep existing, and to be quite frank I hope I die in, is exactly this middle distance: where despair struck pure otherness and created something sublime."

George Saunders - Lincoln in the Bardo - 8/10
  • Told as a dialogue between over 100 different characters, mostly ghosts, the magnitude of work put in to each character astounded me here. One of my absolute favorites of the year. A quick read, I knocked the whole thing out on a day of traveling to Mexico. The story itself is interesting, though not gripping (Abraham Lincoln entering the graveyard to visit his recently deceased son). But the depth of emotion and the reality of human nature addressed via the ghosts' journeys to accepting their own mortality had me teary-eyed and feeling on a flight full of strangers.

Fredrik Backman - Beartown - 8/10
  • This felt like someone took one of my old childhood sports novels and turned it in to an adult version just for me. A small town Canadian hockey team isn't the type of book I would usually pick up, but something about it called to me, and I'm glad it did. One of the key characters in the work, Benji, was probably my favorite of any I've read this year.

Jonathan Franzen - Freedom - 8/10
  • This one came as a recommendation, and another lengthy piece, it is worth it for different reasons than the Goldfinch. While the Goldfinch spoke at times of a depression and despair that I couldn't understand, Freedom was one of those books where you can somehow see yourself in every single character in the book. It was as if every character represented some stage of my life, or someone in my life presently. It also gave me this stanza, which perfectly summarizes my own experiences with attention and compliments.
  • "she believed that it was because she was selflessly team-spirited that direct personal compliments made her so uncomfortable. The autobiographer now thinks that compliments were like a beverage she was unconsciously smart enough to deny herself even one drop of, because her thirst for them was infinite."


Matthew Quick - The Reason You're Alive - 7.5/10
  • NC Book Club Book #4 - From the author of Silver Linings Playbook. I Knocked this out in a few days on Christmas Break. If Hillbilly Elogy is necessary non-fiction to understand the psyche of our current populist right wing, then The Reason You're Alive is its fictional counterpart. This is a quick read, 200 pages, spent in the head of a vietnam war veteran watching the world change around him and seemingly forgetting him. A dynamite read for our current political and social climate.
Colson Whitehead - Underground Railroad - 7/10
  • Great fiction read for any fan of American History. Whitehead takes the history of black America and weaves it beautifully and at times heartbreaking-ly into a single slave narrative. The twist of an actual freedom railroad operating underground made for fascinating imagery.

J.K. Rowling - Cursed Child - 5/10
  • Not sure why I hadn't read it yet - I picked it up around the 20 year anniversary and knocked it out in 2 days. Of course it lacked the magic of the originals and the screenplay format made it annoying at times, but it answered a lot of questions about Time Turners that I'd spent way too much time debating in my lifetime. If you haven't read it yet and you're, like me, a Potter nerd - it's worth it mostly due to the little time you'll have to put into it..

Dennis LeHane - Since we Fell - 4/10
  • Not great, not bad. An interesting read that was meant to keep you hooked from the get-go, it kept me intrigued enough to finish, but the story itself wasn't the most believable and only one character was properly developed. Don't recommend, but it's far from wasted time.

Paula Hawkins - Into the Water - 3/10
  • Maybe it's because I audio-booked Girl on the Train that I enjoyed it so much, but I was anything but impressed by Hawkin's second novel. Predictable throughout and the story seemed at times just a re-write of Girl on the Train. My fear after reading this is that Hawkins will be adopting the model of Grisham, Cussler or Child: Books that will never let you down if you know what you're looking for, because they're all pretty much the same thing in different iterations.

NON-FICTION

Paul Kalanithi - When Breath Becomes Air - 9.5/10
  • I can't remember a book that made me feel like this since I finished the 7th Harry Potter in 2007. I'm talking Where the Red Fern Grows level heartbreak. Paul Kalanithi was finishing his residency in Neurosurgery when he was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. This was his attempt to chronicle his life and experience. What he ended up doing was reshaping my view on humanity, on religion, on human nature. Kalanithi was initially a philosophy and English literature student before switching to medicine, so this book reads more like a humanist manifesto than the story of a dying neurosurgeon. This book is not easily forgettable.

Ta Nehisi Coates - Between the World and Me - 8/10
  • As a white man this was the most challenging book I picked up this year, but I would argue it could also be the most important. You don't have to agree with Coates or with his view of the world. You can even vehemently disagree with it. But reading this is important because you should try to understand it. To empathize with it. Even if you don't agree with Coates you can feel the fear and the hurt he has in this series of letters written to his teenage son. In our current racial climate this should be required reading if only for the discussion it provokes.

Lost City of Z - 7/10
  • Recently made into a movie, this has proven to me one thing: I never want to explore the Amazon… Colonel Fawcett, a famous British Explorer with the Royal Geographic Society, famously disappeared along with his son and son's best friend while searching for El Dorado, or as he called it, Z. Similar to Splendid Savage, this book chronicles the life of a man who never seemed content. The world needs men like this, but I'm pleased that I do not happen to be one, as Fawcett's life, and his family's, were made difficult in many ways by his obsessions with the Amazon. Probably the best historical NF work I've read since Devil in the White City.

A Splendid Savage 7/10
  • My first North Carolina book club read - A historical biography of Frederick Russel Burnham. A scout, a prospector, an explorer, Burnham lived an unbelievably fascinating life. For a history teacher I usually don't read a ton of biographies, as they typically end up taking me a year to get through, but this one held my attention. One of the most fascinating characters I've ever read of.

Hope in the Dark - 5/10
  • At some point this summer I needed something positive to pull me out of the hole of reading the news and realizing nothing was going to change. That the world we were living in was the new normal. This series of essays written almost 10 years ago was an enlightening view of how activism really works. We expect movements or protests or boycotts to be immediately successful, but they rarely are. Instead change, like most else in life, comes gradually and often comes with steps in the wrong direction. But progress, in the end, always wins out.
  • "To hope is to give yourself to the future, and that commitment to the future makes the present inhabitable."

Enough - 5/10
  • John C. Bogle, founder of Vanguard Investments, in writing about the ideal way to handle our personal finances, ended up penning the perfect explanation of why our financial systems crashed in 2008 and why it will undoubtedly happen again. Too much speculation, not enough investment. Our financial system values speculation and hitting it big (see, Bitcoin), but no one values long-term investment anymore. A short-read, It's a great one to slowly work your way through so you have time to digest it all.

RE-READ

Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
  • Childhood classic - had to give it a read to prep for the upcoming Disney remake!

AUDIOBOOK

(I just don't invest into audiobooks quite the same way I do into physical books, so in fairness to these books, I'll just list them below)

  • Stephen King - 12.22.63
  • Ben Winters - The Last Policeman
  •  Paula Hawkins - Girl on the Train

NOW READING

Everything that Remains - a Memoir by the Minimalists 
Ron Chernow - Grant 

Anything you read this year that you think I should pick up? Comment or shoot me a message! I am always in the hunt for a good book, and my list is rapidly expanding.  

Read More

Share Tweet Pin It +1

0 Comments

Powered by Blogger.